Skip to content

Update NUMA feature branch from master#6865

Merged
edwintorok merged 11 commits into
feature/numa-xs9from
master
Jan 27, 2026
Merged

Update NUMA feature branch from master#6865
edwintorok merged 11 commits into
feature/numa-xs9from
master

Conversation

@edwintorok
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

Lin Liu and others added 11 commits January 19, 2026 08:52
Signed-off-by: Lin Liu <lin.liu01@citrix.com>
I have test failing because of incorrect output:
  'Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce nom'
instead of
  'No such file or directory'

Ensure dune is called with LANG=C to avoid such problem.

Signed-off-by: Sebastien Marie <semarie@kapouay.eu.org>
I have test failing because of incorrect output:
  'Aucun fichier ou dossier de ce nom'
instead of
  'No such file or directory'

Ensure dune is called with `LANG=C` to avoid such problem.
Signed-off-by: Christian Lindig <christian.lindig@citrix.com>
Using `CAMLnoreturn` does not seem to work; so returning `unit`.
Without the host parameter, Uri.make returns `file:/path/to/file`. dnf
expects the `file:///path/to/file` variant - using the single slash
variant leads to a failure to locate the signature file.

Signed-off-by: Alex Brett <alex.brett@citrix.com>
Uri.make results in `file:/path/to/file`, rather than the correct
`file:///path/to/file`. This breaks dnf's handling of bundles.
As these TLS communications use 'verifyPeer=yes' actually while applying
CRLs requires root CA certificates and 'verifyChain=yes'.

Signed-off-by: Ming Lu <ming.lu@cloud.com>
Otherwise it might not be clear why 3 different configurations are
needed.

Signed-off-by: Pau Ruiz Safont <pau.safont@vates.tech>
As these TLS communications use 'verifyPeer=yes' actually while applying
CRLs requires root CA certificates and 'verifyChain=yes'.
@edwintorok edwintorok enabled auto-merge January 27, 2026 15:50
@edwintorok edwintorok added this pull request to the merge queue Jan 27, 2026
Merged via the queue into feature/numa-xs9 with commit f8f5a25 Jan 27, 2026
57 of 58 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants